As a result, you may argue that internet charts are extremely precise in terms of planet placement. It’s like having a computer perform all of your computations instead of a human. A competent astrologer may take many hours to generate a thorough Kundali, whereas software may do it in a few clicks. Both will function on the same principle, but the machine will be quicker than a human.

Now, the forecasts made by these software or online Kundalis are based on generic placements of planets, not on their relative positions, aspects, or other factors.

As a result, we don’t believe their projections are even close to being accurate. It can forecast the same future for a group of people who have completely diverse characteristics. You can’t blame the programme for this because even a competent astrologer would struggle to examine every facet of the Kundali. In summary, an online Kundali is useful for determining the position of your planets but not for forecasting their outcomes.

In terms of mathematical calculations of planetary placements, the web software is giving you the truth. That, too, must be double-checked, at least once, using manual calculations and epimerase. However, predicting the future and events or dates needs a great deal of understanding and “reading between the lines,” something a programme cannot perform. Not to take anything away from software, but since they are a realistic part of life, they require a great deal of development, which I am confident will be accomplished.